Six flagship investigations
The decisions that hold
the programme together.
Each feature combines evidence, care implications, practical actions and questions for leaders. Begin here, then follow the connected series.
01 / Bills & marketsFlagship
The first investment decision is an evidence decision: separate prices from consumption, understand the care day and establish a baseline that can survive scrutiny after improvements are made.
02 / Heating & hot waterFlagship
A heating brief should describe the people, rooms and care routines it must serve before comparing equipment. Separate comfort, space heating, hot water and resilience to make the investment decision clearer.
08 / Fabric & comfortFlagship
Insulation, windows and doors belong in one care-building plan with ventilation, summer comfort and safe operation. A better fabric brief starts with how the home is experienced.
09 / Heating & hot waterFlagship
The useful comparison starts with a home's heat requirement and ends with the full cost of delivering dependable warmth and hot water. A grant or an equipment efficiency figure cannot answer that question on its own.
13 / Funding & ownershipFlagship
An improvement needs a workable agreement between the care service, the property owner and the funder. Establish the rights, responsibilities and destination of the benefit before committing capital.
16 / Delivery & performanceFlagship
Commissioning starts the evidence period. A useful care energy programme follows comfort, faults, consumption, full costs and maintenance through the seasons, then decides what to improve next.