The Digital Switchover Reset / Guided chapter 5 of 6

Keep care going when technology is unavailable

The best continuity plan is one staff can understand on an ordinary night shift.

Care Circle Network Editorial Desk · First published · Reviewed 11 November 2026

It is reasonable for care leaders to ask what happens if the internet connection is unavailable or there is a power cut. It is not reasonable to imply that every digital alarm or care record will immediately stop working. Different systems have different local batteries, connectivity, offline functions and monitoring arrangements. We need to establish what applies to the actual service.

Understand: one hour means one particular thing

Ofcom's guidance concerns access to emergency organisations during a power cut for customers dependent on a landline. Communications providers are expected to provide at least one hour of emergency calling access for relevant customers, with a free solution where required. This is not a universal one-hour battery specification for alarm receiving centres, resident call systems, routers, building panels or digital care records. S06

Care organisations should understand the battery and connectivity arrangements for each system on which care depends, including any network switches, routers, alarm controllers and alternative communications. The appropriate duration and solution depend on local needs, risk assessment and professional advice. A blanket four- or eight-hour target does not explain what this particular service needs. Ask the responsible suppliers to explain the duration and safeguards appropriate to your arrangements.

Recognise: the practical questions behind a blackout exercise

Imagine that the normal connection is unavailable overnight. How would staff know that an alarm pathway was affected? Could they reach the right on-call and supplier contacts?

Could they access critical information safely through approved offline or alternative methods? Who would reassure residents and families where necessary? How would the service confirm that the usual arrangement was working again?

Those questions are as important as a device's battery specification. The responses must align with each person's care plan and the provider's established business continuity, safeguarding, fire and emergency processes.

One useful action

Choose an existing continuity discussion or team meeting and walk through one paper scenario: 'At 3 am, we discover that this essential communication route is unavailable. Who notices? Who responds? How does care continue safely? Who tells whom?'

Write down one improvement. This can be as modest as updating an out-of-hours supplier number or clarifying who receives failure alerts. You do not need to stage a building-wide outage to learn something useful.

Testing safely

Any live power, network or alarm simulation must be designed and supervised by the competent technical and safety teams with an agreed test plan, temporary protection and a stop or rollback condition. Do not tell care staff to turn off the mains, disconnect routers or disable a live alarm system as a self-test. Confirm beforehand whether residents, staff, the ARC, the fire-safety lead, building owners and other responders need to be notified.

What if our records are cloud-based?

Ask the software provider about permitted offline access, synchronisation behaviour, device security and the safe alternative process when a connection is lost. Never assume local synchronisation is available. Equally, do not automatically recommend printing personal care data every day. The service should agree any secure contingency access with its clinical, operational and information-governance leads.

Keep this one record

The scenario, participants, action agreed, owner and review date. Link it to the same local readiness record rather than starting another continuity file.

Connected reporting

Previous: Chapter 4.
Existing reporting: Digital continuity: can the care service depend on its systems? and When care systems fail, who tells whom?.
Next: Chapter 6: Know what has been proved.

Connect the evidence to the next step

The reporting behind this chapter.

Follow the complete reporting journey →

Evidence reviewed 11 November 2026

A development behind this decision

A stronger commissioning framework

What changed: DHSC published three digital telecare commissioning guidelines covering personal alarms, grouped living devices and receiving centres.

Who is affected: Commissioners, housing providers and services buying or reviewing telecare.

What to do differently: Use the document for your actual system type. These are non-statutory guidelines; a product claim still needs local acceptance evidence.

Follow the provider explanation →Read the original source ↗
View all developments →

A question is a useful place to begin

Would it help to talk this through?

You can ask even if you are not sure. Choose the route that fits what you need.

Ask Care Circle a question

Tell our editorial team what is unclear. Your question stays with Care Circle and may help us improve the guidance.

Ask the editorial team →

Request specialist support

Explain your situation and the assistance you need. We identify any proposed specialist and ask for your permission before sharing details.

Request specialist support →

No nominated telecoms partner has yet been appointed. These routes are not monitored for emergencies or live faults. If an essential alarm or communication route is failing, use your service’s urgent arrangements and contact the relevant supplier or alarm receiving centre.

Evidence and interpretation

Read the source in its own context.

Network statements have their own scope. DHSC and CQC interpretation concerns England; confirm the relevant national regulator and local arrangements elsewhere in the UK. Published case studies are attributed desk research, not Care Circle site audits.

Explore the complete source record and editorial method →